What you seem to be asking for is something like the v4
delegation 192.0.2.0/24. It was set aside for documentation.
My thought is/was that we might reuse the 5f:: prefix that
predates the 6bone.
%
% there was suggestion to not use 3ffe::/16 space so that it can be later
% (humm, do not know how many years...) reclaimed and reused as part of the
% 001b/3 current addressing architecture. So may be something out of
% 2000::/3 is the right thing, I don't know, and actually, I don't care. My
% point was to reserve a space, any space, for documentation/examples/...
% purposes.
%
% Marc.
%
% At/� 12:08 2001-06-06 -0700, Alain Durand you wrote/vous �criviez:
% >At 11:50 AM 6/6/2001 -0700, Bill Manning wrote:
% >
% >> Strong Objections to this tactic. If you want a 6bone prefix,
% >> you should follow the process. Hijacking is bad form. I'm
% >> sure Bob would be amenable to making the delegation, but
% >> asking is appropriate.
% >
% >This is the reason why I had Cced Bob to this thread.
% >
% >Bob:
% >- do you think it would be appropriate to use a 6bone ptla for that purpose?
% >- what should be the formal process to follow?
% >- would you have any preferences? 3ffe:ff00::/24, 3ffe:5550::/28, anything
% >else?
% >
% > - Alain.
% >
% >--------------------------------------------------------------------
% >IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
% >IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
% >FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
% >Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
% >--------------------------------------------------------------------
%
%
--
--bill
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
