In your previous mail you wrote: > I get the impression you are doing mostly 2). > => more than 2), the IPv6 support is not togglable! In the "real world" you cannot say that. People will want to disable IPv6 for a long time. => if you believe this you should spend more time on a NAT-friendly API (:-) [EMAIL PROTECTED] PS: don't be afraid, jump into the IPv6 world! -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF i... horape
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to... Mauro Tortonesi
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF i... horape
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF i... horape
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to... Mauro Tortonesi
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF i... horape
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to... Jim Bound
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to... Francis Dupont
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF i... horape
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to... Francis Dupont
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF i... horape
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF i... Jim Bound
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF i... Jim Bound
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF i... Jim Bound
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF i... Jim Bound
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF i... Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF i... Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF i... Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
