Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF independence

[Francis Dupont]

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   When we get IPv10, will you prefer to change all your INET6 for INET10,
   or just let the AF independent code do that by itself?
   
=> I can't see a problem before IPv16 (:-)

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

PS: (silly?) suggession: remove AF_INET6 and use AF_INET for IP with
any version with injection of small address spaces in the larger one?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------