hmmmm
/jim
"Shout it out G.L.O.R.I.A." (Them [Van Morrison])
> >we did suggest that there be no default for v6only (in fact I suggested
> >it) and no one on either side wanted that. thinking was even if one did
> >not get their choice then its better to have default for the users.
>
> sorry to be picky. is it correct that "no one on either side wanted
> that"? Dave Thaler and i preferred "no default" at some point.
I dont recall you responding to Tim, Jack and Eriks mail that no default
was very bad???????????? or Dave...............
> >in fact it was about 6 to 3 ratio in favor of v6only not being the
> >default. or if there were 9 people only 3 wanted what you want.
>
> at least the sentence conflict with the above "no one".
No it does not. two different cells in the truth table. First statement
was for ifandonlyif one wanted NO DEFAULT. But I don't recall yours and
Daves input and I could be mistaken I guess.??????
The second was the actual vote ifandonlyif you do not support the current
style of 2553 for 6 years. It was only you, and dave and one other and
one person abstained from linux. Actually it was many more who did not
want the v6only default I was being nice :---)
I just don't want to rehash this again and again.
/jim
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
