>> So I prefer simplest definition to implement such feature if it is
>> included in the specification. That's why I think current specification
>> (-03 draft) is better.
>Simplest is in the eye of the beholder. We have implemented the -02
>behavior and the -03 behavior in the past. I would not agree that the -03
>behavior is simpler is any respect.
the major problem I'm seeing for -02 definition is that there's no
relationship defined (impossible) between the normal TCP data stream
and ancillary data segments. I personally in favor of -03 definition.
itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
