>>>>> On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 10:06:11 +0900 (JST),
>>>>> Atsushi Onoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> If not then both mechanisms should
>> be excised from the document.
> Actually, it is acceptable for me.
Okay with me, too. I just tried to make the document clear in the 03
draft, but in fact I don't see practical usage of receiving the
optional information on TCP sockets. If we can reach a consensus of
leaving it unspecified (by removing the text), it's just fine.
I'll hear from others for a while, then revise the text along with
this approach if no one makes an objection.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
