>> the major problem I'm seeing for -02 definition is that there's no
>> relationship defined (impossible) between the normal TCP data stream
>> and ancillary data segments. I personally in favor of -03 definition.
>So? I didn't realize that having such a relationship had become a requirement.
>If it is, the -03 behavior certainly doesn't meet the requirement either. In
>fact it is substantially further from meeting it than -02.
that is not what I meant. what I'm saying is, since it is impossible
to grab extension header together with the data stream come into the
TCP data stream portion, -03 definition looks more simple. there's no
real need to put extension headers to ancillary data.
itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
