> Okay with me, too. I just tried to make the document clear in the 03 > draft, but in fact I don't see practical usage of receiving the > optional information on TCP sockets. If we can reach a consensus of > leaving it unspecified (by removing the text), it's just fine.
At one level I don't have a problem with removing the 02 and 03 behavior since no TCP applications use this. However, I wonder what we would do if a TCP application comes around and wants to either restrict the extension headers used on the receive side and/or be aware of what is used. Perhaps this is something we can only speculate given that no such applications exist. Erik -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
