Itojun,
>
> >> So I prefer simplest definition to implement such feature if it is
> >> included in the specification. That's why I think current specification
> >> (-03 draft) is better.
> >Simplest is in the eye of the beholder. We have implemented the -02
> >behavior and the -03 behavior in the past. I would not agree that the -03
> >behavior is simpler is any respect.
>
> the major problem I'm seeing for -02 definition is that there's no
> relationship defined (impossible) between the normal TCP data stream
> and ancillary data segments. I personally in favor of -03 definition.
>
So? I didn't realize that having such a relationship had become a requirement.
If it is, the -03 behavior certainly doesn't meet the requirement either. In
fact it is substantially further from meeting it than -02.
Tim Hartrick
Mentat Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
