> Having read through this thread now, might it be better to > recast this document more along the lines of functions > supported on the cellular interface rather than requirements > for host? Some substantial number of devices for which this > is targeted will be dual network interface capable and for the > other interface some of these optimizations don't make sense. > > The Mobile IPv6 related specifications for the time being > only make sense with such a dual network interface capable > device, which means the optimizations recommended on the cell > facing interface in many cases SHOULDN'T be recommended on > the other interfaces.
The cellular host requirements draft is only aimed at minimum cellular host functionality. So if a host has a DSL interface this draft doesn't apply to it. I believe this is already an assumption of the current draft. If instead you have multiple wireless interfaces it would apply. /Karim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
