> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karim El-Malki (ERA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:14 PM
> To: 'Phil Roberts'; 'Tony Hain'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Should connecting to the Internet be Optional?
>
>
> > Having read through this thread now, might it be better to
> > recast this document more along the lines of functions
> > supported on the cellular interface rather than
> requirements > for host? Some substantial number of devices
> for which this > is targeted will be dual network interface
> capable and for the > other interface some of these
> optimizations don't make sense. >
> > The Mobile IPv6 related specifications for the time being
> > only make sense with such a dual network interface capable
> > device, which means the optimizations recommended on the
> cell > facing interface in many cases SHOULDN'T be
> recommended on > the other interfaces.
>
> The cellular host requirements draft is only aimed at minimum
> cellular host functionality. So if a host has a DSL interface
> this draft doesn't apply to it. I believe this is already an
> assumption of the current draft. If instead you have multiple
> wireless interfaces it would apply.
But if your multiple wireless interfaces include something like
WLAN it needs to be spelled out which of these recommendations
apply to which interfaces. No?
>
> /Karim
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
