> > The cellular host requirements draft is only aimed at minimum > > cellular host functionality. So if a host has a DSL interface > > this draft doesn't apply to it. I believe this is already an > > assumption of the current draft. If instead you have multiple > > wireless interfaces it would apply. > > But if your multiple wireless interfaces include something like > WLAN it needs to be spelled out which of these recommendations > apply to which interfaces. No?
If WLAN works differently from a cellular interface then it needs separate consideration (maybe another draft). So this draft wouldn't apply to interfaces for which cellular requirements are not meaningful. But I'm not sure that defining multiple technology hosts is the most urgent bit of the work. I'd be mostly interested in seeing a document which describes what needs to be implemented in the very short run i.e. basic 3gpp v6 hosts. So it makes sense to me that the document concentrate on these and then get updated later if/when new requirements appear. 3gpp has an urgent need and wants to deploy IPv6 so it's a good idea to provide guidance to implementors through the cellular hosts draft. Regarding Mobile IPv6, were you proposing that Mobile IP not be considered in the cellular hosts document if we are only describing requirements for basic cellular hosts and no multiple-technology devices? /Karim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
