Hi Phil, > > I don't think we should. It just starts us down that > > slippery slope of creating new "foo hosts" requirements docs. > > Your following arguments are reason enough to avoid this path. > > Agree we shouldn't.
If the discussion is that creating hosts requirements for every kind of device is a bad idea, well, I think that you may have a point. What I think we have been trying to do in the draft is really discuss the applicability of various IPv6 standards & features for a cellualr host. In some cases, we go beyond what a general host requirements would say. So my question to the list, is what is contained in the draft fundamentally flawed or not. thanks, John -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
