"Hesham Soliman (EAB)" wrote: > > I'm getting very confused when reading this > discussion. Some people are focusing on the > RA intervals, others about DAD (2462) and > others talk generally about ND. > > Please divide the issues... > AFAIK we have the following (independent) issues: > > - RA intervals were reduced by MIPv6 (changing 2461) > - When DAD fails we configure a new address and try again (2462) > - Elimination of DAD delays (optimistic DAD) > - Eliminsation of the random delay before sending an RA (fast RA) > > The last two bullets are addressed in separate drafts. > The first 2 bullets are in the MIPv6 spec, and the > second bullet has nothing to do with 2461.
I agree with Hesham. we should treat them as separate issues instead of lumping them all as ND changes. atleast bullets 1 and 2 should definitely be in the MIPv6 spec. Vijay -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
