ipv6-ops  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: Teredo sunset - did it happen? Phil Mayers
  • Re: Teredo sunset - did it happen? Darren Pilgrim
  • Re: Teredo sunset - did it happen? Phil Mayers
  • Re: Teredo sunset - did it happen? Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: Teredo sunset - did it happen? Brian E Carpenter
  • RE: Teredo sunset - did it happen? Christopher Palmer
  • Re: Teredo sunset - did it happen? Phil Mayers
• Opt Out (UNCLASSIFIED) Deal, Victor T MSG RET
  • How to unsubscribe (Was: Opt Out (UNCLASSIFIED)) Jeroen Massar
  • Re: Opt Out (UNCLASSIFIED) Pim van Pelt
• Re: RING measurements don't match access-networks (Was: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks...) Matthew Luckie
  • Re: RING measurements don't match access-networks (Was: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks...) Jeroen Massar
  • Re: RING measurements don't match access-networks (Was: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks...) Matthew Luckie
  • Re: RING measurements don't match access-networks (Was: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks...) Jeroen Massar
• Fwd: [v6ops] IPv6 MTU Flow-label.... (related to draft-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem-01) Jeroen Massar
• Some very nice IPv6 growth as measured by Google Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
  • Re: Some very nice IPv6 growth as measured by Google Geoff Huston
  • SV: Some very nice IPv6 growth as measured by Google erik.taraldsen
  • Re: Some very nice IPv6 growth as measured by Google Yannis Nikolopoulos
  • Re: Some very nice IPv6 growth as measured by Google Jeroen Massar
  • Re: Some very nice IPv6 growth as measured by Google Tore Anderson
  • Re: Some very nice IPv6 growth as measured by Google Jeroen Massar
  • Re: Some very nice IPv6 growth as measured by Google Tore Anderson
  • Re: Some very nice IPv6 growth as measured by Google Jeroen Massar
  • Re: Some very nice IPv6 growth as measured by Google Tore Anderson
  • Some very nice broken IPv6 networks at Google and Akamai (Was: Some very nice IPv6 growth as measured by Google) Jeroen Massar
  • Re: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks at Google and Akamai sthaug
  • Re: IPv6 issues at Google Kurt Jaeger
  • Re: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks at Google and Akamai Tarko Tikan
  • Re: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks at Google and Akamai Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks at Google and Akamai Joe Hamelin
  • Re: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks at Google and Akamai Daniel Austin
  • Re: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks at Google and Akamai Jeroen Massar
  • Re: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks at Google and Akamai Jeroen Massar
  • MTU = 1280 everywhere? / QUIC (Was: Some very nice ...) Jeroen Massar
  • Re: MTU = 1280 everywhere? / QUIC Vincent Bernat
  • Re: MTU = 1280 everywhere? / QUIC Jeroen Massar
  • RE: MTU = 1280 everywhere? / QUIC Templin, Fred L
  • Re: MTU = 1280 everywhere? / QUIC (Was: Some very nice ...) Jeroen Massar
  • RE: MTU = 1280 everywhere? / QUIC (Was: Some very nice ...) Templin, Fred L
  • Re: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks at Google and Akamai Emanuel Popa
  • Re: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks at Google and Akamai Jeroen Massar
  • Re: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks at Google and Akamai Andras Toth
  • Re: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks at Google and Akamai Jeroen Massar
  • Re: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks at Google and Akamai Pim van Pelt
  • Re: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks at Google and Akamai Jeroen Massar
  • Re: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks at Google and Akamai Nick Hilliard
  • Re: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks at Google and Akamai Sander Steffann
  • Re: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks at Google and Akamai Philipp Kern
  • Re: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks at Google and Akamai Sander Steffann
  • Re: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks at Google and Akamai gboonie
  • Re: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks at Google and Akamai Roger Jørgensen
  • Re: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks at Google and Akamai (Was: Some very nice IPv6 growth as measured by Google) Tore Anderson
  • Re: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks at Google and Akamai (Was: Some very nice IPv6 growth as measured by Google) Nick Hilliard
  • Re: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks at Google and Akamai (Was: Some very nice IPv6 growth as measured by Google) Tore Anderson
  • Re: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks at Google and Akamai (Was: Some very nice IPv6 growth as measured by Google) Jeroen Massar
  • Re: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks at Google and Akamai (Was: Some very nice IPv6 growth as measured by Google) Job Snijders
  • Re: RING measurements don't match access-networks (Was: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks...) Job Snijders
  • Re: RING measurements don't match access-networks (Was: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks...) Jeroen Massar
  • Re: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks at Google and Akamai (Was: Some very nice IPv6 growth as measured by Google) Tore Anderson
  • Re: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks at Google and Akamai (Was: Some very nice IPv6 growth as measured by Google) Doug Barton
  • Re: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks at Google and Akamai (Was: Some very nice IPv6 growth as measured by Google) Jeroen Massar
  • Re: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks at Google and Akamai (Was: Some very nice IPv6 growth as measured by Google) Jeroen Massar
  • Re: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks at Google and Akamai (Was: Some very nice IPv6 growth as measured by Google) Tore Anderson
  • Re: Some very nice broken IPv6 networks at Google and Akamai (Was: Some very nice IPv6 growth as measured by Google) Jeroen Massar
  • Re: Some very nice IPv6 growth as measured by Google Hannigan, Martin
  • Re: Some very nice IPv6 growth as measured by Google Brandon Butterworth
  • Re: Some very nice IPv6 growth as measured by Google Erik Nygren
  • Re: Some very nice IPv6 growth as measured by Google Jaanus Jõgisu
  • Re: Some very nice IPv6 growth as measured by Google Tarko Tikan
  • Re: Some very nice IPv6 growth as measured by Google Mark Tinka
  • Re: Some very nice IPv6 growth as measured by Google Tarko Tikan
  • Re: Some very nice IPv6 growth as measured by Google Bjørn Mork
  • Re: Some very nice IPv6 growth as measured by Google Mark Tinka
• Safari address parsing Miles Mccredie
  • Re: Safari address parsing Antonio Prado
• IPv6 address on Safari 8 Antonio Prado
  • Re: IPv6 address on Safari 8 Jeroen Massar
  • Re: IPv6 address on Safari 8 Antonio Prado
  • Re: IPv6 address on Safari 8 Jeroen Massar
  • Re: IPv6 address on Safari 8 Antonio Prado
  • Re: IPv6 address on Safari 8 Ross Chandler
  • Re: IPv6 address on Safari 8 Antonio Prado
  • Re: IPv6 address on Safari 8 Michael Chang
  • Re: IPv6 address on Safari 8 Doug Barton
  • Re: IPv6 address on Safari 8 Doug Barton
  • Re: IPv6 address on Safari 8 Marco Davids
  • Re: IPv6 address on Safari 8 Doug Barton
• Google IPv6 measurements in Europe appear heading down... Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
  • Re: Google IPv6 measurements in Europe appear heading down... Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
  • Re: Google IPv6 measurements in Europe appear heading down... Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
  • Re: Google IPv6 measurements in Europe appear heading down... Erik Nygren
  • Re: Google IPv6 measurements in Europe appear heading down... Sander Steffann
  • SV: Google IPv6 measurements in Europe appear heading down... erik.taraldsen
  • Re: Google IPv6 measurements in Europe appear heading down... Tore Anderson
  • Re: Google IPv6 measurements in Europe appear heading down... Kate Lance
  • Re: Google IPv6 measurements in Europe appear heading down... Doug Barton
  • Re: Google IPv6 measurements in Europe appear heading down... Geoff Huston
  • Re: Google IPv6 measurements in Europe appear heading down... Kate Lance
  • Re: Google IPv6 measurements in Europe appear heading down... Marco Sommani
  • Re: Google IPv6 measurements in Europe appear heading down... Jernej Horvat
• No 464XLAT in Windows 10? Gunnar Bøe
• DHCPv6 server dhcpy6d 0.4 released Henri Wahl
  • RE: DHCPv6 server dhcpy6d 0.4 released Frank Bulk
• Clueless national monopoly providers Phil Mayers
  • Re: Clueless national monopoly providers Tom Hill
  • Re: Clueless national monopoly providers Bjoern A. Zeeb
  • Re: Clueless national monopoly providers Phil Mayers
  • Re: Clueless national monopoly providers Tim Chown
  • Re: Clueless national monopoly providers Ignatios Souvatzis
  • RE: Clueless national monopoly providers Frank Bulk
  • Re: Clueless national monopoly providers Tore Anderson
  • Re: Clueless national monopoly providers Lorenzo Colitti
  • RE: Clueless national monopoly providers Frank Bulk
• LinkedIn IPv6 issues Dominik Bay
  • Re: LinkedIn IPv6 issues Grant Ridder
• 6to4 in Internet aaaa records Ca By
  • Re: 6to4 in Internet aaaa records Jeroen Massar
  • Re: 6to4 in Internet aaaa records Ca By
  • Re: 6to4 in Internet aaaa records Jeroen Massar
  • Re: 6to4 in Internet aaaa records Ca By
  • Re: 6to4 in Internet aaaa records Erik Kline
  • Re: 6to4 in Internet aaaa records Bjørn Mork
  • Re: 6to4 in Internet aaaa records Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: 6to4 in Internet aaaa records Jen Linkova
  • Re: 6to4 in Internet aaaa records Jens Link
  • Re: 6to4 in Internet aaaa records Gert Doering
  • Re: 6to4 in Internet aaaa records Gert Doering
  • Re: 6to4 in Internet aaaa records Jeroen Massar
  • Re: 6to4 in Internet aaaa records Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: 6to4 in Internet aaaa records Nick Edwards
  • Re: 6to4 in Internet aaaa records Mikael Abrahamsson
  • Re: 6to4 in Internet aaaa records Tore Anderson
  • Re: 6to4 in Internet aaaa records Gert Doering
  • Re: 6to4 in Internet aaaa records Jeroen Massar
• IPv6 Extension Headers in the Real World Fernando Gont
• Anyone else have problems emailing Cisco? (senderbase) Tim Chown
  • Re: Anyone else have problems emailing Cisco? (senderbase) Andrew 👽 Yourtchenko
  • Re: Anyone else have problems emailing Cisco? (senderbase) Tim Chown
  • Re: Anyone else have problems emailing Cisco? (senderbase) Bjørn Mork
  • Re: Anyone else have problems emailing Cisco? (senderbase) Andrew 👽 Yourtchenko
  • Re: Anyone else have problems emailing Cisco? (senderbase) Tim Chown
• MTU Problem: Akamai,HE,GTT Ignatios Souvatzis
  • Re: MTU Problem: Akamai,HE,GTT Erik Nygren
  • Re: MTU Problem: Akamai,HE,GTT Nick Hilliard
• wake on lan / wol with linux in IPv6-LAN (without IPv4) Thomas Schäfer
  • Re: wake on lan / wol with linux in IPv6-LAN (without IPv4) Thomas Schäfer
  • Re: wake on lan / wol with linux in IPv6-LAN (without IPv4) Ignatios Souvatzis
  • Re: wake on lan / wol with linux in IPv6-LAN (without IPv4) Bjørn Mork
  • Re: wake on lan / wol with linux in IPv6-LAN (without IPv4) Tom Hill
  • Re: wake on lan / wol with linux in IPv6-LAN (without IPv4) Mikael Abrahamsson
  • Re: wake on lan / wol with linux in IPv6-LAN (without IPv4) Ignatios Souvatzis
  • Re: wake on lan / wol with linux in IPv6-LAN (without IPv4) Ignatios Souvatzis
  • Re: wake on lan / wol with linux in IPv6-LAN (without IPv4) Enno Rey
  • Re: wake on lan / wol with linux in IPv6-LAN (without IPv4) Mikael Abrahamsson
  • Re: wake on lan / wol with linux in IPv6-LAN (without IPv4) Sander Steffann
  • Re: wake on lan / wol with linux in IPv6-LAN (without IPv4) Andrew 👽 Yourtchenko
  • Re: wake on lan / wol with linux in IPv6-LAN (without IPv4) Steinar H. Gunderson
  • Re: wake on lan / wol with linux in IPv6-LAN (without IPv4) Sander Steffann
  • Re: wake on lan / wol with linux in IPv6-LAN (without IPv4) Stig Venaas
  • Re: wake on lan / wol with linux in IPv6-LAN (without IPv4) Mikael Abrahamsson
  • Re: wake on lan / wol with linux in IPv6-LAN (without IPv4) Phil Mayers
  • Re: wake on lan / wol with linux in IPv6-LAN (without IPv4) Tom Hill
  • Re: wake on lan / wol with linux in IPv6-LAN (without IPv4) Ignatios Souvatzis
  • Re: wake on lan / wol with linux in IPv6-LAN (without IPv4) Phil Mayers
  • Re: wake on lan / wol with linux in IPv6-LAN (without IPv4) Phil Mayers
  • Re: wake on lan / wol with linux in IPv6-LAN (without IPv4) Ignatios Souvatzis
  • Re: wake on lan / wol with linux in IPv6-LAN (without IPv4) Thomas Schäfer
• Windows update fails with ISATAP-like addresses Bernhard Schmidt
  • Re: Windows update fails with ISATAP-like addresses Bernhard Schmidt
  • Re: Windows update fails with ISATAP-like addresses Bernhard Schmidt
• Something with filters Jeroen Massar
  • Re: Something with filters Jared Mauch
  • Re: Something with filters Jeroen Massar
  • Re: Something with filters Sander Steffann
  • Re: Something with filters Jared Mauch
  • Re: Something with filters Lorenzo Colitti
  • Re: Something with filters Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
  • Re: Something with filters Enno Rey
  • Re: Something with filters Steinar H. Gunderson
  • Re: Something with filters Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
  • Re: Something with filters Jared Mauch
  • Re: Something with filters Gert Doering
  • Re: Something with filters Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
  • Re: Something with filters Jeroen Massar
• why don't we start an ipv6 smtp server whitelist? emilio brambilla
  • Re: why don't we start an ipv6 smtp server whitelist? Sander Steffann
  • Re: why don't we start an ipv6 smtp server whitelist? Marco d'Itri
• SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Laurent GUERBY
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Stefan Neufeind
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Daniel Austin
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Bjoern A. Zeeb
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Matija Grabnar
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Marco d'Itri
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Jernej Horvat
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Darren Pilgrim
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Matija Grabnar
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Darren Pilgrim
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Bjørn Mork
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Darren Pilgrim

• Earlier messages
• Later messages