This would work if there were no listeners involved. The listeners of WYSL, what do they get in the way of remuneration for their loss of enjoyment?
There are possibly 10,000 or more involved, at least more than WBZ the IBOC offender and WYSL the one who was wronged by the use of IBOC. Kevin On Nov 5, 2007, at 9:22 AM, Scott Fybush wrote: > There's another way to look at this - it's the free market taking its > course. If 24-hour IBOC service is valuable enough to the owners of > WBZ, > let's say, to justify paying WYSL's price for silence, then why > shouldn't those two parties be able to freely set a price and make > their > transaction? _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
