[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4582?focusedWorklogId=909876&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-909876
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on ARTEMIS-4582:
-------------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 14/Mar/24 12:30
            Start Date: 14/Mar/24 12:30
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: gtully commented on PR #4820:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/4820#issuecomment-1997343935

   And on update, there is a case for suggesting a publisher would need the 
update permission on an address to send a message, or a consumer could be 
updating  by acking. It is not clear that the update permission is about 
management.
   Something like `edit` is less ambiguous, considering all the other perms are 
about messaging. 
   I think i am replacing update with edit.




Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 909876)
    Time Spent: 4h 20m  (was: 4h 10m)

> add view and update permissions to augment the manage rbac for control 
> resources
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-4582
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4582
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Broker, Configuration, JMX, Web Console
>    Affects Versions: 2.31.0
>            Reporter: Gary Tully
>            Assignee: Gary Tully
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 4h 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> we have the manage permission that allows sending to the management address, 
> to access any control resource. We don't however distinguish what a user can 
> do.
> We should segment control operations into categories: CRUD provides a basis
> view for get/is (Read)
> update for set or operations that mutate or modify.
> We allow this sort of configuration via management.xml for jmx mbean access 
> but using a different model based on object name.
> All of the mbeans delegate to the control resources.
> If we add these two additional permissions then we can have a single rbac 
> model (that supports config reload) and more granularity on control resource 
> access from the management address.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to