[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16573670#comment-16573670
]
Vladimir Sitnikov commented on CALCITE-2457:
--------------------------------------------
{quote} But, since I'm not a calcite dev{quote}
You might be aware yet discussion counts as contribution.
{quote} new language is contentious topic, much more than introducing new
library. {quote}
Just wondering, would you consider the following sample to be "a new language"
or not?
https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/0938c7b6d767e3242874d87a30d9112512d9243a/core/src/test/resources/org/apache/calcite/test/HepPlannerTest.xml#L18-L33
> Upgrade to JUnit 5
> ------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-2457
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2457
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Vladimir Sitnikov
> Assignee: Julian Hyde
> Priority: Major
>
> JUnit 5 brings multiple useful features so tests are easier to read and write.
> Is there something that blocks upgrading to JUnit 5?
> By upgrade I mean bumping up the dependency version and creating new tests
> with JUnit 5 features.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)