[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16573670#comment-16573670
 ] 

Vladimir Sitnikov commented on CALCITE-2457:
--------------------------------------------

{quote} But, since I'm not a calcite dev{quote}
You might be aware yet discussion counts as contribution.

{quote} new language is contentious topic, much more than introducing new 
library. {quote}
Just wondering, would you consider the following sample to be "a new language" 
or not?
https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/0938c7b6d767e3242874d87a30d9112512d9243a/core/src/test/resources/org/apache/calcite/test/HepPlannerTest.xml#L18-L33

> Upgrade to JUnit 5
> ------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-2457
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2457
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Vladimir Sitnikov
>            Assignee: Julian Hyde
>            Priority: Major
>
> JUnit 5 brings multiple useful features so tests are easier to read and write.
> Is there something that blocks upgrading to JUnit 5?
> By upgrade I mean bumping up the dependency version and creating new tests 
> with JUnit 5 features.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to