[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13984893#comment-13984893
]
stack commented on HBASE-11093:
-------------------------------
[~ted_yu] Yeah. I think I get it. The takeaway seems to be lets do busy work
until 1.0 on trivial issues -- this should be trivial priority, right? Do you
have numbers on savings this code change makes -- that sucks in FOUR reviewers
for a patch over code that should really be removed (IIUC).
> FilterList#filterRow() iterates through its filters even though
> FilterList#hasFilterRow() returns false
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-11093
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11093
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Ted Yu
> Assignee: Ted Yu
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: 11093-v1.txt, 11093-v2.txt, 11093-v3.txt
>
>
> FilterList#hasFilterRow() returns false when hasFilterRow() of all of
> constituent filters return false.
> However, FilterList#filterRow() still iterates through its filters in this
> scenario.
> The iteration should be skipped when FilterList#hasFilterRow() returns false.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
