[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17155806#comment-17155806
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-11288:
-----------------------------------
{quote}
Cache tier implementation is not part of this discussion unless you think it
needs to be. That the API locating ROOT content is simple and so easy to back
w/ a general cache is sufficient to our purposes here? Or do you think we need
to say more on this topic? (As to the cache implementation, I'd think we'd want
to avoid involving Masters in any caching solution if ROOT is located elsewhere
– involving Masters would undo a 'pro' of the 'general root table' direction as
you point out subsequently in your comment).
{quote}
I think this is a important now as [~toffer] keep saying that it should be the
same as 'master local region' but obviously, your argument later that we should
not involve masters means it is a different solition. Please give a clear
design. I was attacked at the first place because I did not give out a detailed
design, it hurts my feelings because it seems like a double standard.
So let's go back to the plan above? [~stack] please give a clear design on how
to implement the cache server for 'general root table' which do not need to
involve masters, and [~toffer] please go with your ITBLL on the POC to see if
we can get a useful result, and I will implement HBASE-24459 to show how to
deal with the caching for 'master local region'.
Thanks.
> Splittable Meta
> ---------------
>
> Key: HBASE-11288
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11288
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Umbrella
> Components: meta
> Reporter: Francis Christopher Liu
> Assignee: Francis Christopher Liu
> Priority: Major
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
