style95 commented on PR #5333: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/5333#issuecomment-1275471890
> So I'm understanding correctly that there won't be as much whiplash of spawning new containers when an invoker is disabled now creating new containers on a new invoker. Since activations will still be keeping up with demand on the disabled invoker until it's shutdown, it should more gradually schedule new containers on a new invoker? Yes, that would be the best. My intention with this PR is to spawn required containers in advance while some disabled containers are still "active". -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
