bdoyle0182 commented on PR #5333:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/5333#issuecomment-1274964000

   So I'm understanding correctly that there won't be as much whiplash of 
spawning new containers when an invoker is disabled now creating new containers 
on a new invoker. Since activations will still be keeping up with demand on the 
disabled invoker until it's shutdown, it should more gradually schedule new 
containers on a new invoker?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to