szetszwo commented on PR #921: URL: https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/921#issuecomment-1842287866
> A valid, binding veto cannot be overruled. If a veto is cast, it must be accompanied by a valid reason explaining the reasons for the veto. The validity of a veto, if challenged, can be confirmed by anyone who has a binding vote. This does not necessarily signify agreement with the veto - merely that the veto is valid. According to the bylaws quoted above, I would like to challenge [the veto](https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/921#issuecomment-643829659). As mentioned, 45-75 line length is good for `textual information` but it definitely is not good for computer programs nowadays. It is nonsense to enforce min line length in computer programs. It is also nonsense to enforce 75 max line length. Therefore, the veto is invalid. On the other hands, short line length such as 80 does lead to many problems in computer programs -- code readability, encouraging short variable names, unnecessary code formatting efforts, etc. All these problems were not considered in the cited `textual information` recommendation. Could anyone who has a binding vote confirm my challenge? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
