MonkeyCanCode commented on code in PR #1610: URL: https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1610#discussion_r2096800119
########## getting-started/eclipselink/docker-compose.yml: ########## @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ services: --conf, "spark.sql.catalog.quickstart_catalog.type=rest", --conf, "spark.sql.catalog.quickstart_catalog.warehouse=quickstart_catalog", --conf, "spark.sql.catalog.quickstart_catalog.uri=http://polaris:8181/api/catalog", - --conf, "spark.sql.catalog.quickstart_catalog.credential=${USER_CLIENT_ID}:${USER_CLIENT_SECRET}", + --conf, "spark.sql.catalog.quickstart_catalog.credential=${CLIENT_ID}:${CLIENT_SECRET}", Review Comment: I did noticed this one last night and assuming there is intensional. However, going through the quickstart guide, this is supposed to be the credential created at the end of the polaris CLI. But `USER_CLIENT_ID` and `USER_CLIENT_SECRET` is never defined in this context I believed. As an end-user tries to bring up setup via docker compose, there is no relation to the polaris CLI. Now assuming we want to keep it this way, an end-user can't really define this one until polaris CLI returns the value back (which needed to bring up docker compose first, run polaris CLI for entities creation, then restart spark-sql to have this be effective). This restart workflow is really odd imo and we should replace it with other more automated workflow. If this is causing regression, I can change it back. But I don't think we ask user to follow the restart workflow as it is really tedious imo. Let me know what you think. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@polaris.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org