[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15085059#comment-15085059
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TAJO-1971:
--------------------------------------

Github user jihoonson commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/890#discussion_r48931564
  
    --- Diff: 
tajo-catalog/tajo-catalog-server/src/test/java/org/apache/tajo/catalog/CatalogTestingUtil.java
 ---
    @@ -144,14 +144,14 @@ public static PartitionDesc buildPartitionDesc(String 
partitionName) {
         String[] partitionNames = partitionName.split("/");
     
         List<PartitionKeyProto> partitionKeyList = new ArrayList<>();
    -    for(int i = 0; i < partitionNames.length; i++) {
    -      String [] splits = partitionNames[i].split("=");
    +    for (String partitionName1 : partitionNames) {
    --- End diff --
    
    This is also valid, but it looks not a good convention


> Replace 'for' loop with 'foreach'
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAJO-1971
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1971
>             Project: Tajo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Dongkyu Hwangbo
>            Assignee: Dongkyu Hwangbo
>            Priority: Trivial
>              Labels: newbie
>
> Reports for loops which iterate over collections or arrays, and can be 
> replaced with the foreach iteration syntax, available in Java 5 and newer, to 
> get the improvement of readability and so on.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to