Paulo Soares wrote: > This looks like nit-picking but I'll let Bruno answer this one. > > Paulo
I presume the "non-nuclear" restriction was a copy of the original Sun licensing which has the non-nuclear facility caveat ? What was the intended purpose at Sun of this ? What was the intended purpose by iText authors by mimicking this ? * Just a user beware the software should not be used in any real-time life threatening computerized system (due to the garbage collection effect with non-linear processing time) ? * Because the authors have a specific issue with the software being used within the atomic nuclear industry, if so was this to cover power stations ? material processing? weapons ? or some form of anti-nuclear protest ? If the original conception of the thought that is embodied by the wording can be understand then the intent of the statement can be fully understood and a course of action be taken. Darryl ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ iText-questions mailing list iText-questions@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions Buy the iText book: http://itext.ugent.be/itext-in-action/
