On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:57:28 +0100, you wrote: >So if your interpretation of the "don't use technology in places where >lives might depend upon it" is correct, maybe the clause can be >downgraded from being interpreted as a "license restriction" to being >"guidance information" that is not limited to but including all life >support applications.
If you wrote 'This software is not designed for using for ...' this may be ok. But if you wrote 'Thsi software is not licensed for use ...' that is a usage restriction which we can't accept. I agree with you, that an open source author may not take the warrenty for using the software in a special situation, but if you wrote 'is not licensed for' that sound like to prohibit the usage of the software for a special case. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ iText-questions mailing list iText-questions@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions Buy the iText book: http://itext.ugent.be/itext-in-action/
