On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 04:47:41PM -0700, Kirk Bocek wrote: > > > Axel Thimm wrote: > > > I can't say for sure, but I strongly doubt that anything has changed > > wrt XFS. And no stock kernel will be a safe player for XFS (unless you > > are on x86_64). The kernel-suspend2 kernels with 8k stacks are a much > > better choice for a kernel, then (available for FC5 and FC6). > > Axel, the FC6 kernel RPM has a whole slew of failed dependencies (initscripts > and such) that I am not willing to update for fear of breaking too many other > things.
Sorry, I wasn't clear: I implied moving the whole thing to FC5/FC6 iff you want to use kernel-suspend2. But since you're on x86_64 you don't need to worry, forget about the suggestion. > I suspect the RHEL5 kernel will have the same problems. Good idea > though. I think compiling the kernel source is going to be my best bet. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
pgp736EV3W9hf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ivtv-users mailing list [email protected] http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users
