Thanks for your help anyway. Unfortunately, 2.6.18.1 doesn't fix my IVTV problems (sigh). One soldiers on!
Kirk Bocek Axel Thimm wrote: > On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 04:02:03PM -0700, Kirk Bocek wrote: >> >> Axel Thimm wrote: >>> I can't say for sure, but I strongly doubt that anything has changed >>> wrt XFS. And no stock kernel will be a safe player for XFS (unless you >>> are on x86_64). The kernel-suspend2 kernels with 8k stacks are a much >>> better choice for a kernel, then (available for FC5 and FC6). >> Well, I *am* on x86_64. Is 'kernel-suspend2' a kernel setting somewhere? Is >> it >> needed on x86_64? > > Craig already answered what kernel-suspend2 is (thanks, Craig). I was > suggesting the 8k variant of it which has 8k stacks because XFS is > known to be a high stack consumer. For example running XFS and NFS > together on 4k stack kernels is known to crash due to eating too much > stack space. > > x86_64 has 8k stacks to start with and needs less stack space anyway > due to having more register space, so you don't need special tricks to > allow XFS or other stack space eaters to run on it. > > Summa summarum: Since you're on x86_64 don't bother about any of that > (unless you run a 32 bit kernel version on it) > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > ivtv-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users _______________________________________________ ivtv-users mailing list [email protected] http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users
