Hi, > The date of original publication is unknown, but the author is known > to have lived (or flourished) between 1268 and 1327. But as far as I > know, there is no flourish field in BibTeX, and to get it to format > correctly I added to the name.
"flourished" is new to me, too. > It has been a decade since I got my hands on a copy (there is only > ~10 copies of the translation in North America), and I spent a few days > just trying to figure out if Manikyadeva or Suri is the surname. In the > 1200's in the interior of India it was rather inconclusive. There are still parts of India, where there is no concept of first name: http://www.almaden.ibm.com/u/mohan/#name :-) > BibTeX does not always deal gracefully with unicode characters (let > alone Devanāgarī) That is why I am half tempted to look into Biber > <http://biblatex-biber.sourceforge.net/> You should think of switching to biblatex. (http://sourceforge.net/projects/biblatex/). There, a field like "flourished" should be supported easy. Maybe the styles of Dominik Waßenhoven (http://sourceforge.net/projects/biblatex-dw/) help? > Ahhh... You must be using some functionality added since > jgoodies-forms-1.3.0 (which is the latest version I can find anywhere > supported on Gentoo). I am not sure I really want to start supporting > experimental ebuilds for jgoodies-forms-1.6+ We're using jgoodies-forms-1.5.1, but there are good changes, that JabRef will also compile with 1.6+ I think, it's worth the effort to ask the maintainer to update the ebuilds. :-) Cheers, Oliver ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_nov _______________________________________________ Jabref-users mailing list Jabref-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jabref-users
