On Nov 11 2012 1:11 PM, Oliver Kopp wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> An interesting exercise would be to
>> develop a bib(la)tex database for the Early Manuscripts at Oxford
>> University digital collection
>> <http://image.ox.ac.uk/list?collection=all>.
>
> Go ahead :-)))

I already have to many projects without adding a new one, although I am 
sure they would love to have the help from you ;-)))

> I would recommend to publish it at github (http://www.github.com).
> (Hoping that using git is not causing you a headache :))

No.  I have a github account.  I use mercurial more than git, but git 
is an option...

>>> [biblatex]
>> I will look into this, and I also found biber (a biblatex 
>> replacement
>> that has full unicode-6.0 support)
>
> Without the "la" -> biber is a bibtex replacement.
> bibLAtex and biber is the ideal team. The biblatex guys wrote a very
> good documentation. 291 pages :-)
> But "flourished" also doesn't appear there.
>
> Maybe someone of a TUG nearby you wants to assist?

This is a back burner project.  I may well look into upgrading to 
biblatex/biber, but for now I should just jump back into my ongoing 
projects.

>>> ...
>
> The source is there:
>
>  * http://java.net/projects/looks/sources
>  * http://java.net/projects/forms/sources
>  * Common is with sources:
> 
> http://www.jgoodies.com/download/libraries/common/jgoodies-common-1_4_0.zip

I did take a look at them, but (see below)

>>  By convention,
>> Gentoo throws all jar files away and recompiles everything from 
>> scratch
>
> Similar to debian, isn't it? OK. at debian, some systems do it for me
> and provide precompiled binaries :) But with apt-src, I could also do
> it for myself...

yes.  there are some ebuilds which are set up for binary distribution, 
but they are greatly frowned upon, and I was looking to do a version 
bump to the ebuilds already in the main tree.

>> Since the zipballs do not come with the
>> source to rebuild, I cannot imagine any maintainer going through the
>> hassles to get either a binary or live ebuild accepted into the
>> canonical portage tree.
>
> Isn't a subversion repository enough? :)

Well no.  This is what they call "live ebuilds"  The preferred method 
is to make a tag for .zip/.tgz/.bz2 and always build from that.  The 
problem they had in the past is building off of the tip and having 
things periodically break.  I do not know the current feeling for 
building off a particular revision key, but I thought that to was 
verboten.

I may look at this some more later, but we will see what comes of it.

   Thanks and best regards,

   EBo --


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_nov
_______________________________________________
Jabref-users mailing list
Jabref-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jabref-users

Reply via email to