Hi Seb,

Sebastien Lelong wrote:

> I'm back on the next release... I've migrated things from unvalidated to
> validated, since then there were changes, such as device and blink files. We
> can now also add generated samples (from board + test files), to increase
> the number of available samples (when Eur rename his own samples, see other
> topic)

I was under the impression that we would abandon 'validated'... (I 
didn't gave a reaction on this idea but: "no reply is an automatic 
acknowledgement").

In the 0.1 beta we left out the blink samples for which I (or anybody 
else) did not update the matrix. Now you seem to suggest to release 
automatically generated samples. This looks like a change of strategy.
But it's OK with me.

What are 'official "preferred" boards' (other message)?

> I was thinking about refactoring pwm libs, using conditional compile feature
> of last jalv2 compiler, but I'm quite worried about loosing this feature in
> the next release (or at least the way it is in the current), so I prefer
> waiting for this (see jallist)

Reading the discussion in Jallist about conditional compile: I don't 
think we'll loose this functionality.  I also do not see an urgent need 
for changing or extending the current facilities in this repsect.

> So, before the release, we'd need to:
> 
>  * perform some little tests (few)
>  * include generated samples
>  * modify the release script so it is based on a list of file to include
> (see "the end of 'validated' map",
> http://groups.google.com/group/jallib/msg/264984fbd8156ecf)
>  * and release !

I tested a couple of the latest blink samples with the latest device 
files. I didn't test 'm all and therefore I cannot guarantee that all of 
them work perfectly. But what the hack? It's free! If somebody is not 
satisfied with Jallib material ask him what he paid and what he would 
loose by not using it.

> 
> About "the end of 'validated' map, do we all agree ? I've only had feedback
> from Joep... I guess yes, since it will simplify a lot of things :)

I agree with dropping 'validated'.

Regards, Rob.


-- 
Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/)

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to