As we discuss again about the ETP,it appears testing "as much as possible" isn't out priority, so let's forget about it for now, and let's also forget validated, since it does not add values, related to what it costs to maintain it. I'll setup a list of files aimed to be included on the next release, based on what populate validated, but for unvalidated. You guys will add files if you think it should, and if you think other people do agree (for example, we won't add now.jal, because it's not a lib :)).
In the meanwhile, I'll modify the release script to base its work on this file, and produces tarballs and zip. Once done, and once we agree on the content... well, we'll release ! PS: about preferred boards or "official" boards. There can be several board for a given PIC. for instance, Joep has his own board for 16f88, and I have mine (and will add it, probably). Now, we can generate samples from board and test files. So, which board to use ? The one being marked as "preferred". How do we choose ? Well, we'll discuss ! As of now, every Joep's boards are the "preferred" ones, because he deserves it :) PPS: I'll try to do this by the end the WE. PPPS: about conditional compile... I understand what we've got now (not entering a new block when if <constant> is not the original behavior is a kind of bug because it's not the original behavior. Some (...) would want to switch back to the very original behavior, so we'd loose conditional compile as it is today, maybe in favor of a new keywords, or something like that. My opinion about this is also that, yes a "cif" or the like keyword will probably be used by only lib writers (us), but does this justify that we feel pain using it ? More, everyone should be able to contribute to jallib by sharing libs. this is not a "advanced users" vs. dummies. Contributing should be as easy as possible, and if being a "if"/conditional guru is mandatory, it won't help... Seb 2008/12/18 Joep Suijs <[email protected]> > > 2008/12/18, Rob Hamerling <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > What are 'official "preferred" boards' (other message)? > We can generate samples (well, I can't yet...) of each test file for > (multiplied with) each board file. But in case (..) others start using > board/test files, there will be multiple board files for the same PIC, > resulting in multiple examples from the same test-file and for the > same pic. The preferred board file is a way to prevent this and > generate only one example for each pic and each test file. > > > > I tested a couple of the latest blink samples with the latest device > > files. I didn't test 'm all and therefore I cannot guarantee that all of > > them work perfectly. But what the hack? It's free! > Right! > > >If somebody is not > > satisfied with Jallib material ask him what he paid and what he would > > loose by not using it. > Or... aks him what HE is going to do to prevent with the next jallib > release ;) > > Joep > > > > -- Sébastien Lelong http://www.sirloon.net http://sirbot.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
