Having just got some ks0108 glcd stuff to work (on a 16f723a), it appears to me that:
- glcd_ks0108.jal line 453 defines "lcd_write_char", while glcd_common.jal is expecting "*g*lcd_write_char" (see line 216). This is a regression? Earlier revs seem to have "glcd", but the diff function here in google code doesn't totally make sense to me so I'm not sure - correcting that, *and* defining a font (by including both glcd_nXn_font and glcd_font) enables me to output at least one char via the glcd pseudo var I posted earlier on the yahoo group (before I found the missing G), but it's awaiting moderation .. and can be safely ignored I think. PG -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/jallib/-/RIzM6gqZ-kMJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
