On Friday, 19 August 2011 23:23:57 UTC+10, Joep wrote: > > That comment is indeed obsolete. It's easy to remove this and > regenerate the samples. Just say the word and I will take care > The point is this does not fix the issue and I am not able to do > actual testing on this code. I also do not understand why this sample > seems to pass buildbot if there is a missing procedure..
It falls back to another procedure if glcd_write_char is missing, so I suspect that's why it passes. PG -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/jallib/-/2OriQoNtQQEJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
