I always tend to use internal oscillator at least for blink samples. Also in smaller 8pin PICs using external pins will limit the pins available.
Sunish On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 2:30 AM, mattschinkel <[email protected]> wrote: > The reason for more HS then INTOSC could just be because the blink samples > have shaped our samples like that. Whenever I test a new chip and make a new > sample, I usually copy whatever is in the blink sample and use it since > there is a high probability that it will work right away. > > Having one sample with conditionals might be good, we could try and see what > it looks like. The oscillator target clock speed would have to go in the > conditional as well. A simple if statement would be good, no need to use "if > defined" > > Matt. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "jallib" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
