Hi Matt,
On 12.03.14 22:00, mattschinkel wrote:
The reason for more HS then INTOSC could just be because the blink samples have shaped our samples like that. Whenever I test a new chip and make a new sample, I usually copy whatever is in the blink sample and use it since there is a high probability that it will work right away.
Yes, another purpose of the blink samples (and our responsibility to have 'm complete and correct)!
Having one sample with conditionals might be good, we could try and see what it looks like. The oscillator target clock speed would have to go in the conditional as well. A simple if statement would be good, no need to use "if defined"
That would indeed reduce the amount of files, but still have a sample for both HS and INTOSC. Even though it can be a simple 'if', it won't make the soure easier to understand by a newbie. How do we know if this will be acceptable, where can I find a test-newbie? ;-)
Regards, Rob. -- R. Hamerling, Netherlands --- http://www.robh.nl -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
