[Harmeet] > > > - Keep scope as close to what is being attempted. We have been > making > > more > > > design changes than a bug fix/cleanup needs. > >
[Serge] > > Yes which are fixing show-stopper bugs and improving performace by 30% > +. > > > > Whats an email server if you can't count on it to do its job? How many > > people keep asking "is it production ready?" > [Peter] > Agreed. One minor correction. Performance improvement isn't 30%, it's > 900%. Prior to these changes James crashed under a load of ~6 > mails/second (360 mails/minute). With the current code base (Watchdog, > object pooling, deleteonexit removed) we are getting a performance of > ~60 mails/second (3600 mails/minute). This is not a minor correction. I think you have done an excellent job. While I may not agree with you all the time but what you have done is very creditable. What I was suggesting neither discourages or slows. It may do the opposite - facilitate and make things easier. Harmeet -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:james-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:james-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
