From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The NNTP code was broken for a long time with no one working on it. Peter > fixed it and posted changes for comment. Obviously, he didn't ignore the > discussion, because you and he got into an argument over the changes. You > two couldn't agree
Yes, Peter found exact problem. I offerred to fix it and he ignored and checked it in. The question I had was - Why did he invite the discussion and if he had he should have let the author make a stab at it before changing the design. This is esp. important as the author had disagreed with the changes. Anyway ignored that but it that was followed by some more design changes that seemed to be only driven by cleanup instincts and caused at least one significant regression. Btw. for all the excitement about bug fixing and pointing to implementation/design flaws, I haven't seen any test added to verify the functionality. We should augment our testing. I don't think much is to be gained by continuing this thread. I really would like us to get over 2.1 and focus on 3.0. Hopefully NNTP will be a focus for 3.0 along with more testing. Harmeet -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:james-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:james-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
