Harmeet Bedi wrote:
The scope of this change doesn't seem clear and doesn't seem small. So I'm -1 to any fixes/changes to NNTP for the 2.1 release at this point. Accordingly I'll +1 the change to disable NNTP since it won't be working.----- Original Message ----- From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>I think that you just have a very hard time not pointing fingers...to point fingers at. Ego-less programming. If a change breaks something, the change is broken, NOT THE CHANGER.Noel if there are many regressions caused by one developer, it is the right thing to point fingure and expect improvements. I will be happy if the person promises to test more in future. If there are number of changes(as half a dozen protocol server regressions indicate) the process is to have a proposal not checkin into head. Checkin into head impacts everyone and causes 11th hour headaches for the release. Harmeet
--
Serge Knystautas
Loki Technologies - Unstoppable Websites
http://www.lokitech.com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
