Ehlo
> > > > VRML (close to non-existent)
>
> is insulting not only to all the thousands of VRML worldbuilders but also
>to all those people who gave their time and effort inorder to create the
>VRML'97 standard, there are literally thousands of sites on the web
>featuring VRML content, the least of all being my own. As regards VRML
>being replaced with X3D , from what I have seen so far X3D has no where
>near the level and breadth of capabilities that are found now in our
>Multi-user VRML worlds and if the author of these statements had actually
>taken the time to explore the wealth of VRML websites she/he would not
>have been so foolish as to dismiss VRML so lightly.
Well I knew something like that would happen and that some hardcore
VRML-people will disagree but fact is no one is starting up new VRML
things. VRMLs popularity was somewhere in the mid-99/early 2000. But if
you ask someone building up new webcontent nearly anyone is regarding
VRML. (At least in my experience). The problem is the highbandwith format
itself (either you are limited to small worlds or highbandwith users)
MPEG4/X3D is a good alternative yes.
Just my opinion
EOF,
J.D.
--
Jmark2k+1 (http://www.antiflash.net/jmark)
Test the performance of your PC online!
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff JAVA3D-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
