Will.
On 15/10/2004, at 7:03 AM, Pondrom, Pierre L wrote:
I agree because that would fix the problem I am currently having. It has taken me years to get my department to try it.
There is a 2D library, why not a 3D library. It should at least be an option in the deployment.
On the hand, is it is stable enough. Should you burden downloads to people that don't need it. Will it someday be replaced with something better? Then it will be like AWT is to Swing :- )
-----Original Message-----
From: Alessandro Borges [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 3:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JAVA3D] Java 6.0 - Time for 3D support ?
Java 5 is out. The next release codenamed Mustang is the on the way.
I think is time to ask for native 3D support in the JRE without extra downloads. The last Java3D builds are less than 1.5mb size. JOGL is another small one candidate API .
Some points against are :
• the 3D API to be include in the JRE must be stable enough,
• usually the release cycle of a 3D API is shorter than full JRE;
But native 3D support is a MUST have feature for Java 6.0. Did you agree ?
Alessandro
Yahoo! Acesso Grátis - Internet rápida e grátis. Instale o discador agora! =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff JAVA3D-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
=========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff JAVA3D-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
