I am interested in the license info, GPL vs non-GPL is very important in what I do.
I've never seriously used the word 'freetard', i think it could get you into trouble in some circles. I prefer the traditional Australian judgment of 'bloody idiot'. On Nov 19, 8:46 am, DAemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At the risk of opening myself up to accusations of being a > 'freetard,'* the license of a project does help determine whether or > not I take a look at it, and it definitely affects whether I use it or > not (since the vast majority of my stuff at the moment is under the > GPL). > > *On another note, is anyone else completely unable to seriously use > that word thanks to This Ain't Your Dad's Java? They use it every > other sentence, and by the end of a podcast it loses all meaning. > > DAemon > > 2008/11/19 kibitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Dick wondered whether including the OSS licence type in news items is > > necessary. For myself, the licence type doesn't affect whether I go > > look at something so I'd happily leave it out. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
