I'm in the same boat, I don't commit the license type of every project to memory, but I confirm commercial restrictions on use, or know I have to arrange the purchase of the commercial version.
It's up to Dick in the end, but that's the kind of purpose I use the podcast for, keeping up with developments and hearing what's new, and if I can use it in my work. (As well as the amusing chit chat). On Nov 20, 1:31 am, Jess Holle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Weiqi Gao wrote: > > For those of you who claim you care very much about software licenses, > > here is a quick quiz: Under what licenses are you using (or not using) > > the following popular Java-ish products? > > I don't know, but for each that I actually use I know that I've > confirmed that there are no license restrictions on commercial usage. I > don't care which license says that -- just that I know that much. > > > > > 1. mail.jar > > 2. asm.jar > > 3. JRuby > > 4. Grails > > 5. JBoss Seam > > 6. Scala --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
