Yes I think GSM holds a lot of things back I am afraid. Unfortunately it will take a while to happen, once things move away from GSM around the world and into more IP based options (I guess?? but not a telco expert). At the moment no one has interest in this.
On Jan 31, 3:52 pm, Reinier Zwitserloot <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Peter, Michael: > > I apologize, I should have been more specific. I meant: video call -on > a mobile phone-. I make video calls routinely when I'm behind my desk. > But when I'm using a mobile phone (which presumes that I'm not already > seated behind a computer and therefore probably on the move, busy, or > distracted): Never even had the slightest itch for it. > > As far as video calling for kitchens and the like - the idea being > that you can chat while busily preparing something: Sure, but, it's > not going to be with a mobile phone, because you'd have to put it on a > stand. Perhaps 1984-esque tv/camera combo screens all around the > house, with a central computer system that figures out where you are > and routes your (video)calls to the right screen/camera device. That > seems more likely to me. > > As for voice quality: I had that exact same idea a while back. Why do > iPhones and android phones still use a crappy outdated algorithm? If > they packed-switched the voice data using a modern algorithm that can > rely on a far better CPU, then the voice quality could triple without > using more bandwidth. Let alone that bandwidth isn't nearly as big an > issue these days. Unfortunately the GSM standard doesn't really allow > that kind of flexibility. I don't know if continuous streams of > packets across the 3G are more demanding for a cell tower than a > standard GSM voice block. If they are, that would certainly be a > roadblock. Perhaps the phones can encode a better quality audio INTO > the gsm voice stream. That'd be an awesome hack. When the call is > routed, your phones will beep at each other to realize they both speak > this protocol, and then, -bing-, your voice quality just improves > markedly on the spot. Would be a nice sell for either the iPhone or > android phones: Convince your friend to buy this phone too - your > calls will sound soo much better! > > On Jan 30, 11:53 pm, Peter Becker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Reinier Zwitserloot wrote: > > > [...]> Video calling has been available for years and I haven't ever, - > > > ever-, seen anyone do it. Care to name an exception? Are you video > > > calling? > > > I have to out myself: I do. Admittedly I'm only using MSN/Skype/etc on a > > computer and it all started with grandparents watching a baby/toddler on > > the other side of the world, but I have also used it with my friends > > that I rarely see in real life since we are all modern nomads. > > > It's not going to replace normal phone call, though (at least not for > > me). My mobile phone doesn't have the second camera and I don't care. > > Webcam into the room or on top of my netbook is convenient and I can > > certainly see someone setting up a videoconferencing configuration in > > their kitchen in the near future. Maybe then it becomes interesting to > > video-call in from a mobile, but I personally don't see myself running > > around with my mobile phone held up in front of me. > > > Peter --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
