I saw the killer application of forward facing video camera on a phone
today on the train.

A woman was using it to check her hair.

It's apparent we don't understand the real, compelling uses of
technology.

On Feb 2, 9:53 am, Michael Neale <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes I think GSM holds a lot of things back I am afraid.
>
> Unfortunately it will take a while to happen, once things move away
> from GSM around the world and into more IP based options (I guess??
> but not a telco expert). At the moment no one has interest in this.
>
> On Jan 31, 3:52 pm, Reinier Zwitserloot <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hey Peter, Michael:
>
> > I apologize, I should have been more specific. I meant: video call -on
> > a mobile phone-. I make video calls routinely when I'm behind my desk.
> > But when I'm using a mobile phone (which presumes that I'm not already
> > seated behind a computer and therefore probably on the move, busy, or
> > distracted): Never even had the slightest itch for it.
>
> > As far as video calling for kitchens and the like - the idea being
> > that you can chat while busily preparing something: Sure, but, it's
> > not going to be with a mobile phone, because you'd have to put it on a
> > stand. Perhaps 1984-esque tv/camera combo screens all around the
> > house, with a central computer system that figures out where you are
> > and routes your (video)calls to the right screen/camera device. That
> > seems more likely to me.
>
> > As for voice quality: I had that exact same idea a while back. Why do
> > iPhones and android phones still use a crappy outdated algorithm? If
> > they packed-switched the voice data using a modern algorithm that can
> > rely on a far better CPU, then the voice quality could triple without
> > using more bandwidth. Let alone that bandwidth isn't nearly as big an
> > issue these days. Unfortunately the GSM standard doesn't really allow
> > that kind of flexibility. I don't know if continuous streams of
> > packets across the 3G are more demanding for a cell tower than a
> > standard GSM voice block. If they are, that would certainly be a
> > roadblock. Perhaps the phones can encode a better quality audio INTO
> > the gsm voice stream. That'd be an awesome hack. When the call is
> > routed, your phones will beep at each other to realize they both speak
> > this protocol, and then, -bing-, your voice quality just improves
> > markedly on the spot. Would be a nice sell for either the iPhone or
> > android phones: Convince your friend to buy this phone too - your
> > calls will sound soo much better!
>
> > On Jan 30, 11:53 pm, Peter Becker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Reinier Zwitserloot wrote:
>
> > > [...]> Video calling has been available for years and I haven't ever, -
> > > > ever-, seen anyone do it. Care to name an exception? Are you video
> > > > calling?
>
> > > I have to out myself: I do. Admittedly I'm only using MSN/Skype/etc on a
> > > computer and it all started with grandparents watching a baby/toddler on
> > > the other side of the world, but I have also used it with my friends
> > > that I rarely see in real life since we are all modern nomads.
>
> > > It's not going to replace normal phone call, though (at least not for
> > > me). My mobile phone doesn't have the second camera and I don't care.
> > > Webcam into the room or on top of my netbook is convenient and I can
> > > certainly see someone setting up a videoconferencing configuration in
> > > their kitchen in the near future. Maybe then it becomes interesting to
> > > video-call in from a mobile, but I personally don't see myself running
> > > around with my mobile phone held up in front of me.
>
> > >   Peter
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to