On 11.2.2010 13:29, Karsten Silz wrote: > On Feb 11, 12:15 pm, Fabrizio Giudici <fabrizio.giud...@tidalwave.it> > wrote: >>> I found this article to be a great >>> introduction in how Git differs from CVS/SVN: >>> http://alblue.blogspot.com/2010/02/git-for-eclipse-users.html(despite >>> the title, Eclipse only comes into play in the very last paragraph - >>> and yes, Eclipse and Netbeans couldn't agree once more, with Eclipse >>> going with git and Netbeans with Mercurial). >> >> ... but NetBeans has got a third party plugin for Git too. >> >> http://michael-bien.com/mbien/entry/netbeans_git_plugin >> http://code.google.com/p/nbgit/ > > There's an Mercurial plug-in for Eclipse, too (http://www.vectrace.com/ > mercurialeclipse/). My point was that the Netbeans sources itself are > stored in Mercurial (remember Tor talking about this extensively on a > podcast), whereas the Eclipse guys decided to offer git as the > standard distributed version control system to Eclipse projects, in > addition to CVS and SVN. >
Mercurial integration kicks ass on both Eclipse and Netbeans. Git is usable in Eclipse but utter crap on Netbeans. I blogged about this a while ago... http://hamandeggs.wordpress.com/2009/12/25/my-jump-into-the-modern-scms/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
