It's at this point, I post this link: http://blog.bitquabit.com/2010/02/10/fightings-been-fun-and-all-its-time-shut-and-get-along/
On Feb 12, 1:31 pm, Jess Holle <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2/11/2010 8:07 PM, Joshua Marinacci wrote:>> There's an Mercurial plug-in > for Eclipse, too (http://www.vectrace.com/ > >> mercurialeclipse/). My point was that the Netbeans sources itself are > >> stored in Mercurial (remember Tor talking about this extensively on a > >> podcast), whereas the Eclipse guys decided to offer git as the > >> standard distributed version control system to Eclipse projects, in > >> addition to CVS and SVN. > > > Yes, this is because after much research most of the Sun opensource > > projects moved to Mercurial, including the JDK itself. > > The unfortunate part is that git seems to be much more used than > Mercurial on the whole and NetBeans' support for git is not in line with > its Mercurial support -- leaving NetBeans playing second fiddle for > manyu users in this regard. > > Overall it seems like Mercurial was selected over git based on > short-term criteria. > > -- > Jess Holle -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
