code.google.com allows for both subversion and hg (mercurial), while github allows for hosting in a git repo.

The nice thing, though, is that you can use subversion as your master repository, and there are plugins from both mercurial and git to allow you to treat the SVN repo as if it were simply a master git or hg repository. So locally you work in hg or git, and you push changes back which get rolled into SVN commits. This way others can use svn, but whoever wants to can use DVCS. Of course, that only works if you're using the traditional centralized workflow... but that's pretty typical... especially for migrated repositories.

cheers,
Christian.


On Feb 12, 2010, at 4:22 AM, Michael Neale wrote:

Nice find !

Yes they are both excellent. I assume hg is as easy to get going with
as git when you first install it? If so - go with either, you wont be
disappointed.

For me, the killer feature was github - as I am lazy - and it kind of
holds my hand on how to do things (or did initially). I am sure there
are alternatives for hg as well.



On Feb 12, 3:02 pm, Steven Herod <[email protected]> wrote:
It's at this point, I post this link:

http://blog.bitquabit.com/2010/02/10/fightings-been-fun-and-all-its- t...

On Feb 12, 1:31 pm, Jess Holle <[email protected]> wrote:



On 2/11/2010 8:07 PM, Joshua Marinacci wrote:>> There's an Mercurial plug-in for Eclipse, too (http://www.vectrace.com/
mercurialeclipse/). My point was that the Netbeans sources itself are stored in Mercurial (remember Tor talking about this extensively on a
podcast), whereas the Eclipse guys decided to offer git as the
standard distributed version control system to Eclipse projects, in
addition to CVS and SVN.

Yes, this is because after much research most of the Sun opensource projects moved to Mercurial, including the JDK itself.

The unfortunate part is that git seems to be much more used than
Mercurial on the whole and NetBeans' support for git is not in line with
its Mercurial support -- leaving NetBeans playing second fiddle for
manyu users in this regard.

Overall it seems like Mercurial was selected over git based on
short-term criteria.

--
Jess Holle

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en .


Christian Edward Gruber
e-mail: [email protected]
weblog: http://www.geekinasuit.com/

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java 
Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to