On Feb 11, 12:15 pm, Fabrizio Giudici <[email protected]> wrote: > > I found this article to be a great > > introduction in how Git differs from CVS/SVN: > >http://alblue.blogspot.com/2010/02/git-for-eclipse-users.html(despite > > the title, Eclipse only comes into play in the very last paragraph - > > and yes, Eclipse and Netbeans couldn't agree once more, with Eclipse > > going with git and Netbeans with Mercurial). > > ... but NetBeans has got a third party plugin for Git too. > > http://michael-bien.com/mbien/entry/netbeans_git_plugin > http://code.google.com/p/nbgit/
There's an Mercurial plug-in for Eclipse, too (http://www.vectrace.com/ mercurialeclipse/). My point was that the Netbeans sources itself are stored in Mercurial (remember Tor talking about this extensively on a podcast), whereas the Eclipse guys decided to offer git as the standard distributed version control system to Eclipse projects, in addition to CVS and SVN. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
